fore the "{," described what the text should look like then how the font should be manipulated and closed everything with "}." This is more logical being that the look of the writing was described by "tCascading Style Sheets (CSS) are another way for web designers to tell the web browser how the website should look. HTML does this already but CSS has greater advantages.

With HTMl you would normally describe a paragraph with the ‹font› tag followed by the specifiers such as color, size, face, et ct. If you wanted other changes to the font, they aren't logically a font tag specifier. They would have their own tag such as ‹b› for bold or ‹i› for italics.

CSS defeats the poor logic behind the original design of the people who created HTML. In CSS you could describe font for a paragraph by using something like the following:

p{ color:black; text-align:center; font-size:large; font-family:arial; font-weight:bold; }

As you can see, we defined the paragraph tag with the "p" before the "{," described what the text should look like then how the font should be manipulated and closed everything with "}." This is more logical being that the look of the writing was described by "te

lly describe a paragraph with the ‹font› tag followed by the specifiers such as color, size, face, et ct. If you wanted other changes to the font, they aren't logically a font tag specifier. They would have their own tag such as ‹b› for bold or ‹i› for italics.

CSS defeats the poor logic behind the original design of the people who created HTML. In CSS you could describe font for a paragraph by using something like the following:

p{ color:black; text-align:center; font-size:large; font-family:arial; font-weight:bold; }

As you can see, we defined the paragraph tag with the "p" before the "{," described what the text should look like then how the font should be manipulated and closed everything with "}." This is more logical being that the look of the writing was described by "t

ave their own tag such as ‹b› for bold or ‹i› for italics.

CSS defeats the poor logic behind the original design of the people who created HTML. In CSS you could describe font for a paragraph by using something like the following:

p{ color:black; text-align:center; font-size:large; font-family:arial; font-weight:bold; }

As you can see, we defined the paragraph tag with the "p" before the "{," described what the text should look like then how the font should be manipulated and closed everything with "}." This is more logical being that the look of the writing was described by "t

ing something like the following:

p{ color:black; text-align:center; font-size:large; font-family:arial; font-weight:bold; }

As you can see, we defined the paragraph tag with the "p" before the "{," described what the text should look like then how the font should be manipulated and closed everything with "}." This is more logical being that the look of the writing was described by "t

fore the "{," described what the text should look like then how the font should be manipulated and closed everything with "}." This is more logical being that the look of the writing was described by "text" specifiers--text being defined as the written word and therefore its look--and the typesetting and size manipulated by "font" specifiers--font being defined as a complete set of type of one size and face.

Now let's dissect the above. To start a CSS entry, we must tell the web browser what we are defining. This would normally be an HTML tag. The one above defines the paragraph tag "p" but you could also do the span tag "span" or any table tag such as "td." After telling what we are defining, we must open the script dialog. We do this by putting "{." We may then enter our definitions.

HTML is very limited in definitions. One may only specify bold, size, and color. With CSS we may define not just bold but how bold. We may define not just size in terms of pitch but also, percentages, pixe