so bad at profiling and not competent enough to do their job.

Not long ago a friend of mine was put on a fraud watch-list for owning 100 websites. In my humble opinion, owning a 100 website domains to attract customers to one's business is hardly a scam, it is good business sense. I think I had 60 at one time, to fit every single possible market niche we serviced or would servi

It seems we have a new wave of regulations hampering free speech and the regulatory agencies are using deceptive advertising laws to curb what they believe to be buzz marketing. Here is how it works. Lets say you do business with someone and they pay you and then you write on your Blog how wonderful they are and their company.

If you do this without telling the reader you are being paid or if you do this without identifying your association then you are breaking Buzz Marketing Laws. Indeed I had someone tell me that I must be;

...up to some sort of Internet "Buzz Marketing" scam because NO ONE could or would ever write 11,111 articles for no reason.

So, I asked them if they read any of the articles? They said a few and so I asked them;

"Really and thus you base your findings on that extensive research now?"

Amazing indeed and it is my opinion that these regulators go on a fishing expedition to prove them selves correct. Whatever? I guess it gives them something to do. After all anyone that stupid probably does have a tough time finding a job, but alas the government is always hiring someone new?

In my opinion there is an unbelievable the amount of "bad profiling" that goes on with bureaucrats who are so lazy they will not even check-out, or presume innocence, assuming that every anomaly a computer picks up is a "questionable" when in reality MOST are "false positives". This only proves that the programmers of such systems are also bad at profiling and not competent enough to do their job.

Not long ago a friend of mine was put on a fraud watch-list for owning 100 websites. In my humble opinion, owning a 100 website domains to attract customers to one's business is hardly a scam, it is good business sense. I think I had 60 at one time, to fit every single possible market niche we serviced or would servic

eing paid or if you do this without identifying your association then you are breaking Buzz Marketing Laws. Indeed I had someone tell me that I must be;

...up to some sort of Internet "Buzz Marketing" scam because NO ONE could or would ever write 11,111 articles for no reason.

So, I asked them if they read any of the articles? They said a few and so I asked them;

"Really and thus you base your findings on that extensive research now?"

Amazing indeed and it is my opinion that these regulators go on a fishing expedition to prove them selves correct. Whatever? I guess it gives them something to do. After all anyone that stupid probably does have a tough time finding a job, but alas the government is always hiring someone new?

In my opinion there is an unbelievable the amount of "bad profiling" that goes on with bureaucrats who are so lazy they will not even check-out, or presume innocence, assuming that every anomaly a computer picks up is a "questionable" when in reality MOST are "false positives". This only proves that the programmers of such systems are also bad at profiling and not competent enough to do their job.

Not long ago a friend of mine was put on a fraud watch-list for owning 100 websites. In my humble opinion, owning a 100 website domains to attract customers to one's business is hardly a scam, it is good business sense. I think I had 60 at one time, to fit every single possible market niche we serviced or would servi

w and so I asked them;

"Really and thus you base your findings on that extensive research now?"

Amazing indeed and it is my opinion that these regulators go on a fishing expedition to prove them selves correct. Whatever? I guess it gives them something to do. After all anyone that stupid probably does have a tough time finding a job, but alas the government is always hiring someone new?

In my opinion there is an unbelievable the amount of "bad profiling" that goes on with bureaucrats who are so lazy they will not even check-out, or presume innocence, assuming that every anomaly a computer picks up is a "questionable" when in reality MOST are "false positives". This only proves that the programmers of such systems are also bad at profiling and not competent enough to do their job.

Not long ago a friend of mine was put on a fraud watch-list for owning 100 websites. In my humble opinion, owning a 100 website domains to attract customers to one's business is hardly a scam, it is good business sense. I think I had 60 at one time, to fit every single possible market niche we serviced or would servi

government is always hiring someone new?

In my opinion there is an unbelievable the amount of "bad profiling" that goes on with bureaucrats who are so lazy they will not even check-out, or presume innocence, assuming that every anomaly a computer picks up is a "questionable" when in reality MOST are "false positives". This only proves that the programmers of such systems are also bad at profiling and not competent enough to do their job.

Not long ago a friend of mine was put on a fraud watch-list for owning 100 websites. In my humble opinion, owning a 100 website domains to attract customers to one's business is hardly a scam, it is good business sense. I think I had 60 at one time, to fit every single possible market niche we serviced or would servi

so bad at profiling and not competent enough to do their job.

Not long ago a friend of mine was put on a fraud watch-list for owning 100 websites. In my humble opinion, owning a 100 website domains to attract customers to one's business is hardly a scam, it is good business sense. I think I had 60 at one time, to fit every single possible market niche we serviced or would service in the future.

We bought them all to use as we expanded. Homing in and thinly slicing the niche is smart and you know now almost all Political Advisors, Marketers and MBA instructors are starting to recommend this. In marketing you do what works and when you find what works you keep doing that until it no longer works, modifying it as you go.

If systems are designed to pick-up anomalies and end up catching the dolphins in the drag net too that are superstars, then the superstars will stop shining and no else will produce or achieve. It sets a bad precedence to not understand the nature of profiling. For instance I cross every possible domain and must pop up on lists daily in various sectors, it is not my fault that others think linearly and I think multi-dimensional (the correct way in my opinion). What do you think?