record that if you cannot beat your competition on price if they start a price war, then you are not as efficient as you should be.

In that case you are too fat and no longer have the agility of a start up in the mark

So many business leaders and MBA professors say that cutting prices actually hurts profits and it hurts the industry and no one wins. This may be well documented in industries where price competition was not applied correctly or one company started dumping into the market in order to increase market share, but if a company is truly on the ball and has their systems, supply chains, manufacturing processes and management under control and they are operating as efficiently as possible, then their business model should allow them to win a price war.

In fact in reality; There is nothing wrong with winning on Price! And there is nothing wrong with winning. Artificial market or industry price boosting actually can be a bad thing, because it makes companies weak and fat, instead of lean and trim and ready to complete the marathon at a record breaking pace. I would like to state for the record that if you cannot beat your competition on price if they start a price war, then you are not as efficient as you should be.

In that case you are too fat and no longer have the agility of a start up in the marke

y or one company started dumping into the market in order to increase market share, but if a company is truly on the ball and has their systems, supply chains, manufacturing processes and management under control and they are operating as efficiently as possible, then their business model should allow them to win a price war.

In fact in reality; There is nothing wrong with winning on Price! And there is nothing wrong with winning. Artificial market or industry price boosting actually can be a bad thing, because it makes companies weak and fat, instead of lean and trim and ready to complete the marathon at a record breaking pace. I would like to state for the record that if you cannot beat your competition on price if they start a price war, then you are not as efficient as you should be.

In that case you are too fat and no longer have the agility of a start up in the mark

e operating as efficiently as possible, then their business model should allow them to win a price war.

In fact in reality; There is nothing wrong with winning on Price! And there is nothing wrong with winning. Artificial market or industry price boosting actually can be a bad thing, because it makes companies weak and fat, instead of lean and trim and ready to complete the marathon at a record breaking pace. I would like to state for the record that if you cannot beat your competition on price if they start a price war, then you are not as efficient as you should be.

In that case you are too fat and no longer have the agility of a start up in the mark

ial market or industry price boosting actually can be a bad thing, because it makes companies weak and fat, instead of lean and trim and ready to complete the marathon at a record breaking pace. I would like to state for the record that if you cannot beat your competition on price if they start a price war, then you are not as efficient as you should be.

In that case you are too fat and no longer have the agility of a start up in the mark

record that if you cannot beat your competition on price if they start a price war, then you are not as efficient as you should be.

In that case you are too fat and no longer have the agility of a start up in the market place and have slipped into a micro-managed stodgy, bureaucracy and well, in that case, my Dear Sir, I am not impressed, because I think you are weak and have lost your competitive edge and therefore my friend you better check six, because the whole nine yards are loaded and we plan to win, using any and ALL methods possible including perhaps cutting price to do so. Consider all this in 2006.