h; ["theory" "mathematics" "physics" "military"]. For politics or leaders, I might consider comments in the top psychology papers of our day or the comments in one of these papers and pick items which might show in spirit such things as [ "Machiavellianism, Poise and Polish, Achievement Drive, Forcefulness, Wit" ].

Once we compile the list potential geni

Currently governments, corporations and research folks are scouring the Internet to find Geniuses amongst the human race. Why the push? Well the race is on and the future is at stake in a very competitive world. As the human populations keep dummying down and the need for geniuses goes hyperbolic; the competition to find them has reached a frantic pace. But how can we find the Geniuses quickly?

Well, thinking out loud here, my comments initially would be; Since Google Searches are simplistic my thoughts would be some trial and error approaches and even contacting them to assist me if I so needed. Google has the biggest database of web pages to help us locate all the geniuses of course.

Indeed if I were in charge of such a project, then I would wish to play around with it a bit and try new things and then answer the question of "How" after playing around with the search engines a bit and to that point why use one search engine? And what about some of the newer search engine algorithms being developed at Berkeley, Stanford or we know there are also multiple search engines sites, who might have just what I (we) might need.

The Search Continues, but which parameters shall we use? Well consider if I was to search: [ "philosophy" "art" "science" ] as a combo search, then I would perhaps find many pages of Category Sites or Colleges with all those listed on the same page. But down a ways I would find in the 15,000 range many people who had put up their resumes, Blogs, interests, etc and contact them.

Now lets say I wanted future thinkers for Military; I might search; ["theory" "mathematics" "physics" "military"]. For politics or leaders, I might consider comments in the top psychology papers of our day or the comments in one of these papers and pick items which might show in spirit such things as [ "Machiavellianism, Poise and Polish, Achievement Drive, Forcefulness, Wit" ].

Once we compile the list potential geni

inking out loud here, my comments initially would be; Since Google Searches are simplistic my thoughts would be some trial and error approaches and even contacting them to assist me if I so needed. Google has the biggest database of web pages to help us locate all the geniuses of course.

Indeed if I were in charge of such a project, then I would wish to play around with it a bit and try new things and then answer the question of "How" after playing around with the search engines a bit and to that point why use one search engine? And what about some of the newer search engine algorithms being developed at Berkeley, Stanford or we know there are also multiple search engines sites, who might have just what I (we) might need.

The Search Continues, but which parameters shall we use? Well consider if I was to search: [ "philosophy" "art" "science" ] as a combo search, then I would perhaps find many pages of Category Sites or Colleges with all those listed on the same page. But down a ways I would find in the 15,000 range many people who had put up their resumes, Blogs, interests, etc and contact them.

Now lets say I wanted future thinkers for Military; I might search; ["theory" "mathematics" "physics" "military"]. For politics or leaders, I might consider comments in the top psychology papers of our day or the comments in one of these papers and pick items which might show in spirit such things as [ "Machiavellianism, Poise and Polish, Achievement Drive, Forcefulness, Wit" ].

Once we compile the list potential geni

hen answer the question of "How" after playing around with the search engines a bit and to that point why use one search engine? And what about some of the newer search engine algorithms being developed at Berkeley, Stanford or we know there are also multiple search engines sites, who might have just what I (we) might need.

The Search Continues, but which parameters shall we use? Well consider if I was to search: [ "philosophy" "art" "science" ] as a combo search, then I would perhaps find many pages of Category Sites or Colleges with all those listed on the same page. But down a ways I would find in the 15,000 range many people who had put up their resumes, Blogs, interests, etc and contact them.

Now lets say I wanted future thinkers for Military; I might search; ["theory" "mathematics" "physics" "military"]. For politics or leaders, I might consider comments in the top psychology papers of our day or the comments in one of these papers and pick items which might show in spirit such things as [ "Machiavellianism, Poise and Polish, Achievement Drive, Forcefulness, Wit" ].

Once we compile the list potential geni

if I was to search: [ "philosophy" "art" "science" ] as a combo search, then I would perhaps find many pages of Category Sites or Colleges with all those listed on the same page. But down a ways I would find in the 15,000 range many people who had put up their resumes, Blogs, interests, etc and contact them.

Now lets say I wanted future thinkers for Military; I might search; ["theory" "mathematics" "physics" "military"]. For politics or leaders, I might consider comments in the top psychology papers of our day or the comments in one of these papers and pick items which might show in spirit such things as [ "Machiavellianism, Poise and Polish, Achievement Drive, Forcefulness, Wit" ].

Once we compile the list potential geni

h; ["theory" "mathematics" "physics" "military"]. For politics or leaders, I might consider comments in the top psychology papers of our day or the comments in one of these papers and pick items which might show in spirit such things as [ "Machiavellianism, Poise and Polish, Achievement Drive, Forcefulness, Wit" ].

Once we compile the list potential geniuses, then we would have them take one of those online Mensa Tests? And if 132 is the cutoff then raise the % of questions that they must get right to equal the number we wish? Rather than re-invent the wheel we should use other peoples models, since they already exist is my first thought. And we would not need to be too locked in to start. If the numbers came back so high it was overwhelming we could data dump some of it?

The question remains who will find all the Geniuses first; them or us? Well either way I certainly hope that this topic is of interest and that it will indeed propel thought in 2007.