scale for submitting a project report is:

• Accurate, following format, and submitted >1 day early = 5.0
• Accurate, following format, and submitted 1 day early = 4.0
• Accurate, following format and on time = 3.0
• Accurate, following format and less than 1 day late = 2.0
• Any combination of errors, not following format, and late any amount = 1.0

1. Clearly define each team member's key task expectations regarding performance toward teamwork goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress.

You can use a similar technique for the "teamwork" requirement. Distribute a questionnaire aMuch is written in Project Management journals about every conceivable facet of project teams. Topics about their organization, culture, communication with clients, problem solving skills, etc. are virtually endless. There are lots of rules, tips, and suggestions about what they should do but not as much on how to do it.

For example, "high performance work teams" has been a catch phrase for a long time. Everyone wants to create one or think they are a part of one. But how would a PM actually develop one? If you aren't sure, this will get you started in the right direction.

PREPARE THE PROJECT ENVIRONMENT

1. Publish the project mission statement with clearly expressed terms of quality, quantity, and time in 25 words or less.

"We will design a document processing workflow that is capable of processing at least 1,500 documents (quantity) daily (time) with no errors (quality)." 25 words or less helps you keep it simple and the project team members focused on the desired outcome.

There should be much greater detail about desired deliverables in the project scope, of course, but a simple and direct summary can be very useful for the daily workings of the team. For example, any decision that a team member may be facing can be simplified by using the mission statement: "If doing task X helps us get closer to processing a minimum of 1,500 documents a day with no errors, we should do it. If it doesn't serve the mission, don't do it."

1. Identify the 3-5 key project-focused tasks for which each member is responsible and also include a team-focused task such as "teamwork".

Publish the few team positions and what you expect from each. For example, team leaders may be responsible for project-focused tasks such as conducting weekly meetings with their sub-teams with minutes kept and distributed; scheduling and tracking work schedules; collecting specific reports weekly, summarizing them, and forwarding to the project manager; resolving conflicts between members or with other sub-teams.

There is also a critical team-focused task simply called "teamwork". Expectations within this may include reliability, cooperation with others, helpfulness, and knowledge sharing. This reminds team members that we have obligations to each other as well as to the client.

1. Clearly define each team member's key task expectations regarding performance toward project goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress.

This takes us back to grade school when we always knew how we were doing before the report cards came out. The teacher had a grading scale against which we compared the feedback we received from scores on homework, book reports, and tests. This allowed us to self-regulate our performance whether we wanted to make the honor roll or just keep our grades high enough that our parents didn't ground us.

A project team member's expectations may be expressed like this on a 1-5 scale where 5 is most desirable and 1 is least desirable. A 3.0 score is considered "the least acceptable":

"Project team leaders' performance assessment scale for submitting a project report is:

• Accurate, following format, and submitted >1 day early = 5.0
• Accurate, following format, and submitted 1 day early = 4.0
• Accurate, following format and on time = 3.0
• Accurate, following format and less than 1 day late = 2.0
• Any combination of errors, not following format, and late any amount = 1.0

1. Clearly define each team member's key task expectations regarding performance toward teamwork goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress.

You can use a similar technique for the "teamwork" requirement. Distribute a questionnaire amn a document processing workflow that is capable of processing at least 1,500 documents (quantity) daily (time) with no errors (quality)." 25 words or less helps you keep it simple and the project team members focused on the desired outcome.

There should be much greater detail about desired deliverables in the project scope, of course, but a simple and direct summary can be very useful for the daily workings of the team. For example, any decision that a team member may be facing can be simplified by using the mission statement: "If doing task X helps us get closer to processing a minimum of 1,500 documents a day with no errors, we should do it. If it doesn't serve the mission, don't do it."

1. Identify the 3-5 key project-focused tasks for which each member is responsible and also include a team-focused task such as "teamwork".

Publish the few team positions and what you expect from each. For example, team leaders may be responsible for project-focused tasks such as conducting weekly meetings with their sub-teams with minutes kept and distributed; scheduling and tracking work schedules; collecting specific reports weekly, summarizing them, and forwarding to the project manager; resolving conflicts between members or with other sub-teams.

There is also a critical team-focused task simply called "teamwork". Expectations within this may include reliability, cooperation with others, helpfulness, and knowledge sharing. This reminds team members that we have obligations to each other as well as to the client.

1. Clearly define each team member's key task expectations regarding performance toward project goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress.

This takes us back to grade school when we always knew how we were doing before the report cards came out. The teacher had a grading scale against which we compared the feedback we received from scores on homework, book reports, and tests. This allowed us to self-regulate our performance whether we wanted to make the honor roll or just keep our grades high enough that our parents didn't ground us.

A project team member's expectations may be expressed like this on a 1-5 scale where 5 is most desirable and 1 is least desirable. A 3.0 score is considered "the least acceptable":

"Project team leaders' performance assessment scale for submitting a project report is:

• Accurate, following format, and submitted >1 day early = 5.0
• Accurate, following format, and submitted 1 day early = 4.0
• Accurate, following format and on time = 3.0
• Accurate, following format and less than 1 day late = 2.0
• Any combination of errors, not following format, and late any amount = 1.0

1. Clearly define each team member's key task expectations regarding performance toward teamwork goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress.

You can use a similar technique for the "teamwork" requirement. Distribute a questionnaire a/u>-focused task such as "teamwork". Publish the few team positions and what you expect from each. For example, team leaders may be responsible for project-focused tasks such as conducting weekly meetings with their sub-teams with minutes kept and distributed; scheduling and tracking work schedules; collecting specific reports weekly, summarizing them, and forwarding to the project manager; resolving conflicts between members or with other sub-teams.

There is also a critical team-focused task simply called "teamwork". Expectations within this may include reliability, cooperation with others, helpfulness, and knowledge sharing. This reminds team members that we have obligations to each other as well as to the client.

1. Clearly define each team member's key task expectations regarding performance toward project goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress.

This takes us back to grade school when we always knew how we were doing before the report cards came out. The teacher had a grading scale against which we compared the feedback we received from scores on homework, book reports, and tests. This allowed us to self-regulate our performance whether we wanted to make the honor roll or just keep our grades high enough that our parents didn't ground us.

A project team member's expectations may be expressed like this on a 1-5 scale where 5 is most desirable and 1 is least desirable. A 3.0 score is considered "the least acceptable":

"Project team leaders' performance assessment scale for submitting a project report is:

• Accurate, following format, and submitted >1 day early = 5.0
• Accurate, following format, and submitted 1 day early = 4.0
• Accurate, following format and on time = 3.0
• Accurate, following format and less than 1 day late = 2.0
• Any combination of errors, not following format, and late any amount = 1.0

1. Clearly define each team member's key task expectations regarding performance toward teamwork goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress.

You can use a similar technique for the "teamwork" requirement. Distribute a questionnaire a expectations regarding performance toward project goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress. This takes us back to grade school when we always knew how we were doing before the report cards came out. The teacher had a grading scale against which we compared the feedback we received from scores on homework, book reports, and tests. This allowed us to self-regulate our performance whether we wanted to make the honor roll or just keep our grades high enough that our parents didn't ground us.

A project team member's expectations may be expressed like this on a 1-5 scale where 5 is most desirable and 1 is least desirable. A 3.0 score is considered "the least acceptable":

"Project team leaders' performance assessment scale for submitting a project report is:

• Accurate, following format, and submitted >1 day early = 5.0
• Accurate, following format, and submitted 1 day early = 4.0
• Accurate, following format and on time = 3.0
• Accurate, following format and less than 1 day late = 2.0
• Any combination of errors, not following format, and late any amount = 1.0

1. Clearly define each team member's key task expectations regarding performance toward teamwork goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress.

You can use a similar technique for the "teamwork" requirement. Distribute a questionnaire a scale for submitting a project report is:

• Accurate, following format, and submitted >1 day early = 5.0
• Accurate, following format, and submitted 1 day early = 4.0
• Accurate, following format and on time = 3.0
• Accurate, following format and less than 1 day late = 2.0
• Any combination of errors, not following format, and late any amount = 1.0

1. Clearly define each team member's key task expectations regarding performance toward teamwork goals with a range of measurable performance levels so they can self-monitor their performance progress.

You can use a similar technique for the "teamwork" requirement. Distribute a questionnaire among the team members asking for their opinion on a sliding scale of 1-5 where 1 = "never see this" to 5 = "always see this". Include an option of "not observed" for new members who don't feel they have been there long enough to make a fair assessment.

"Please rate your assessment of each team member's behavior in these areas:

• Reliability
• Cooperation with others
• Helpfulness
• Knowledge Sharing"

The performance score of an individual team member in these teamwork categories would be the average of the responses from team members for each of the four behaviors above. Again, an average of 3.0 would be the least acceptable score.

A project manager can shift much of the weight of managing the team members from his or her shoulders to those of the team members by putting in place the expectations and a performance assessment system before the project starts. This way, the team members can determine for themselves how they are doing without having to wait to hear it from the PM.

Then conduct assessments (report cards) on a regular schedule during the life of the project. This way, the team members can decide for themselves whether they want to achieve the project's "honor roll" or just get by so the PM doesn't ‘ground them".

PREPARE THE PROJECT MEMBER

There are a few simple things that can prepare the team member to become as effective as possible on your project team. (This assumes, of course, the PM has already determined they are qualified to become a project team member.)

1. Each team member should receive a brief measurable and documented orientation.

This gives the PM assurance each member clearly understands the project's mission; the PM's expectations of them; what they can expect from the PM; the performance assessment system; and the frequency of performance assessment periods ("the report card grading period - every six weeks.")

Also, access badges or any other unique requirements or equipment can be issued at this time.

1. There should be a project "kick-off" meeting that not only discusses the purpose, nature, and expectations of the project but also a review of the teamwork expectations of each other.

PREPARE THE PROJECT MANAGER

There are at least three things the PM should do as an on-going practice leading the team that are not associated with any specifics of a particular project. These deal with fundamental human motivation and morale.

1. Make sure you have had this communication with each of your direct reports on the project team on a regular basis. Insist that they do the same with theirs:

1. You can identify at least two project-related strengths and "opportunities for improvement" (we don't like to hear about our weaknesses) for each direct report and communicate that to them. We like to hear about what we do well so we can keep doing it and what we need to do better so we can be praised.

1. You can identify two or three non-budgetary rewards that have value for each team member. Then you can give them these rewards when they exceed your expectations