If am not mistaken, Hillary Clinton had a vote on the war and each and every one of the spending increases Bush requested. If she didn’t agree with them she should have worked harder to get the other 500+ members of Congress to take her side.

Over the last number of years I have done a lot of research on how the government spends their money in addition to some other laws. For

Anyone who has read any of my articles knows that I write about many different topics. As much as I was trying to avoid it I am now going to write about one thing that really bothers me, politics in America. I heard Hillary Clinton’s speech the other day where she claims that the Bush Administration would go down as one of the worst to ever run this country.

This is an example of what I do not like about politics. She is clearly positioning herself for a run at the White House in 2008. So she, just like most politicians, is going to attack the current administration to try and make herself look good. The problem is people buy into this propaganda.

Assuming the President is responsible for all the problems of the country, which he is not, some of the problems she is blaming Bush for are a direct result of what her husband did not do when he was President. He had Osama Bin Laden caught and let him go. If he had held onto him then 9/11 may never have happened, which means the current war may not have happened. There is no way to know for sure if they would not have but it is safe to say that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 and the war in Iraq is related to the “harboring terrorists” and threat on America issues that Bush discussed in his speech after 9/11.

As far as Bush being responsible for the budget deficit, that is ridiculous. Bush cannot spend a dime of the American’s money without approval from the Congress. Bush also went to, and got approval for, going to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. If am not mistaken, Hillary Clinton had a vote on the war and each and every one of the spending increases Bush requested. If she didn’t agree with them she should have worked harder to get the other 500+ members of Congress to take her side.

Over the last number of years I have done a lot of research on how the government spends their money in addition to some other laws. For

of what I do not like about politics. She is clearly positioning herself for a run at the White House in 2008. So she, just like most politicians, is going to attack the current administration to try and make herself look good. The problem is people buy into this propaganda.

Assuming the President is responsible for all the problems of the country, which he is not, some of the problems she is blaming Bush for are a direct result of what her husband did not do when he was President. He had Osama Bin Laden caught and let him go. If he had held onto him then 9/11 may never have happened, which means the current war may not have happened. There is no way to know for sure if they would not have but it is safe to say that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 and the war in Iraq is related to the “harboring terrorists” and threat on America issues that Bush discussed in his speech after 9/11.

As far as Bush being responsible for the budget deficit, that is ridiculous. Bush cannot spend a dime of the American’s money without approval from the Congress. Bush also went to, and got approval for, going to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. If am not mistaken, Hillary Clinton had a vote on the war and each and every one of the spending increases Bush requested. If she didn’t agree with them she should have worked harder to get the other 500+ members of Congress to take her side.

Over the last number of years I have done a lot of research on how the government spends their money in addition to some other laws. For

problems she is blaming Bush for are a direct result of what her husband did not do when he was President. He had Osama Bin Laden caught and let him go. If he had held onto him then 9/11 may never have happened, which means the current war may not have happened. There is no way to know for sure if they would not have but it is safe to say that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 and the war in Iraq is related to the “harboring terrorists” and threat on America issues that Bush discussed in his speech after 9/11.

As far as Bush being responsible for the budget deficit, that is ridiculous. Bush cannot spend a dime of the American’s money without approval from the Congress. Bush also went to, and got approval for, going to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. If am not mistaken, Hillary Clinton had a vote on the war and each and every one of the spending increases Bush requested. If she didn’t agree with them she should have worked harder to get the other 500+ members of Congress to take her side.

Over the last number of years I have done a lot of research on how the government spends their money in addition to some other laws. For

11 and the war in Iraq is related to the “harboring terrorists” and threat on America issues that Bush discussed in his speech after 9/11.

As far as Bush being responsible for the budget deficit, that is ridiculous. Bush cannot spend a dime of the American’s money without approval from the Congress. Bush also went to, and got approval for, going to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. If am not mistaken, Hillary Clinton had a vote on the war and each and every one of the spending increases Bush requested. If she didn’t agree with them she should have worked harder to get the other 500+ members of Congress to take her side.

Over the last number of years I have done a lot of research on how the government spends their money in addition to some other laws. For

If am not mistaken, Hillary Clinton had a vote on the war and each and every one of the spending increases Bush requested. If she didn’t agree with them she should have worked harder to get the other 500+ members of Congress to take her side.

Over the last number of years I have done a lot of research on how the government spends their money in addition to some other laws. For example, I bet most people did not know that Congress is responsible for approving their own raises. Yes, that is correct. The people that are responsible for spending our money for the last 100 years, totaling close to $8 TRILLION in debt, decide on their pay increases. Essentially that is like going to your auto mechanic for repairs in giving him your check book and letting him decide how much he wants. They are spending your money and not doing it wisely. What should really happen is the people should have to vote on their pay increases. If we do not feel they are doing a job worthy of a pay increase then we vote NO.

The government’s budget is available on the internet via the White House website. The White House has predicted that our national debt will be roughly $10.5 TRILLION by 2009. So, in 3 years they are predicting they will spend $2.5 trillion more than they have. I do not have all my research in front of my so this number may be off a bit but the budget for to operate the White House is $40 million a year. The first family is given $100,000 just for decorations every year. In the 8 years Hillary Clinton was the first lady she had $800,000 to spend on decorations for a house that is 200 years old. How many more decorations does it need? My point in all this is that there are homeless people in this country and our leader and his family spend $100,000 just on decorations. That money could be used to feed the homeless people.

Politicians stand up election after election and promise things