(1) Explicit Contradictions

Do they tell you one thing on a certain occasion, and then the story seems noticeably out of alignment a short time later?

For instance, a person who claims to be a fitness nut over the phone, but who steps outside for frequent smoking breaks when you meet, in pe

Maybe it was a barely perceptible inner voice that said: “I don’t trust this person!”

Do you wonder where it comes from? This judgment, that we’re in the presence of someone who is going to let us down, or perhaps has already secretly decided to take advantage?

This only happens to me rarely, but when it does, my first response is to give whatever proposal I’m considering at least a little more time. If someone is trying to con you, generally that’s one thing he’ll avoid, because he wants you to act impulsively, to overcome your natural inhibitions and self-protective instincts.

But creating a time buffer isn’t always sufficient, because some people are perpetrating “the long con.” This, by definition, is a scheme that takes place over time. It’s a big stakes game, requiring deeper and deeper trust on the part of the victim, the mark.

In fact, in a long con, the perpetrator may challenge the mark to take his time, showing what appears to be nonchalance and all of the patience in the world. The mark is induced to feel that he sets the pace. Nobody is pressuring him, no sir!

I believe there are some telltale signs that we’re dealing with someone we shouldn’t trust:

(1) Explicit Contradictions

Do they tell you one thing on a certain occasion, and then the story seems noticeably out of alignment a short time later?

For instance, a person who claims to be a fitness nut over the phone, but who steps outside for frequent smoking breaks when you meet, in per

This only happens to me rarely, but when it does, my first response is to give whatever proposal I’m considering at least a little more time. If someone is trying to con you, generally that’s one thing he’ll avoid, because he wants you to act impulsively, to overcome your natural inhibitions and self-protective instincts.

But creating a time buffer isn’t always sufficient, because some people are perpetrating “the long con.” This, by definition, is a scheme that takes place over time. It’s a big stakes game, requiring deeper and deeper trust on the part of the victim, the mark.

In fact, in a long con, the perpetrator may challenge the mark to take his time, showing what appears to be nonchalance and all of the patience in the world. The mark is induced to feel that he sets the pace. Nobody is pressuring him, no sir!

I believe there are some telltale signs that we’re dealing with someone we shouldn’t trust:

(1) Explicit Contradictions

Do they tell you one thing on a certain occasion, and then the story seems noticeably out of alignment a short time later?

For instance, a person who claims to be a fitness nut over the phone, but who steps outside for frequent smoking breaks when you meet, in pe

But creating a time buffer isn’t always sufficient, because some people are perpetrating “the long con.” This, by definition, is a scheme that takes place over time. It’s a big stakes game, requiring deeper and deeper trust on the part of the victim, the mark.

In fact, in a long con, the perpetrator may challenge the mark to take his time, showing what appears to be nonchalance and all of the patience in the world. The mark is induced to feel that he sets the pace. Nobody is pressuring him, no sir!

I believe there are some telltale signs that we’re dealing with someone we shouldn’t trust:

(1) Explicit Contradictions

Do they tell you one thing on a certain occasion, and then the story seems noticeably out of alignment a short time later?

For instance, a person who claims to be a fitness nut over the phone, but who steps outside for frequent smoking breaks when you meet, in pe

I believe there are some telltale signs that we’re dealing with someone we shouldn’t trust:

(1) Explicit Contradictions

Do they tell you one thing on a certain occasion, and then the story seems noticeably out of alignment a short time later?

For instance, a person who claims to be a fitness nut over the phone, but who steps outside for frequent smoking breaks when you meet, in pe

(1) Explicit Contradictions

Do they tell you one thing on a certain occasion, and then the story seems noticeably out of alignment a short time later?

For instance, a person who claims to be a fitness nut over the phone, but who steps outside for frequent smoking breaks when you meet, in person, is conning himself.

How can he be straight with you?

(2) Implicit Contradictions

A person who claims to be financially well off but who drives a car with vintage body damage is either eccentric or it’s more likely that he used the insurance proceeds from the crash to pay other pressing bills. Holes in the shoes and poor or ragged haircuts tell a similar story.

I realize that there are frugal people who are millionaires, and one famous billionaire, Warren Buffett, is known to drive modest cars and to still live in the house he occupied when he was just starting his career. Still, he may not be my definition of dapper, but he’s presentable.

(3) His Supporting Cast: Are They Supportive?

Few of us operate all by ourselves. We have cohorts around us. How do they perform? Are they at ease, attending to their own business, or are they showing signs that they’re monitoring your interaction with the guy you suspect of being untrustworthy? If they pay too much attention to how he’s doing with you, whether you’re falling under the spell, or if they seem hostile toward him, that’s a tip-off all is not well.

(4) Are You In The Presence of A Predator?

We all have a sixth sense for danger, though I believe we’ve been talked out