o re-submit the search.

Besides there are many common miss spellings, which are so common that they are considered normal and where do you draw the line anyway. Not to mention th

Should the purposefully miss spelling of words be allowed on online article submission websites? Why would anyone want to miss spell a word in the title of an article that they wrote, as it would make them look silly and stupid right? Well there are some people doing this to get the clicks from the search engines when someone makes a typo when searching by accident you see?

Some online article submissions wish to prevent and ban all miss spellings in the title of their articles to prevent these folks from “gaming” the search engines. But in doing so they might hurt other authors and this is why I completely disagree and believe miss spellings should be allowed. Because many people miss key strokes and then end up having to re-submit the search.

Besides there are many common miss spellings, which are so common that they are considered normal and where do you draw the line anyway. Not to mention tha

as it would make them look silly and stupid right? Well there are some people doing this to get the clicks from the search engines when someone makes a typo when searching by accident you see?

Some online article submissions wish to prevent and ban all miss spellings in the title of their articles to prevent these folks from “gaming” the search engines. But in doing so they might hurt other authors and this is why I completely disagree and believe miss spellings should be allowed. Because many people miss key strokes and then end up having to re-submit the search.

Besides there are many common miss spellings, which are so common that they are considered normal and where do you draw the line anyway. Not to mention th

you see?

Some online article submissions wish to prevent and ban all miss spellings in the title of their articles to prevent these folks from “gaming” the search engines. But in doing so they might hurt other authors and this is why I completely disagree and believe miss spellings should be allowed. Because many people miss key strokes and then end up having to re-submit the search.

Besides there are many common miss spellings, which are so common that they are considered normal and where do you draw the line anyway. Not to mention th

doing so they might hurt other authors and this is why I completely disagree and believe miss spellings should be allowed. Because many people miss key strokes and then end up having to re-submit the search.

Besides there are many common miss spellings, which are so common that they are considered normal and where do you draw the line anyway. Not to mention th

o re-submit the search.

Besides there are many common miss spellings, which are so common that they are considered normal and where do you draw the line anyway. Not to mention that the English versions of words are often different slightly and you might miss all those potential article views. I think linear and stupid people often want to make rules before they think through the repercussions of the rules they make.

For instance BioDiesel is not a word in the dictionary. Bio Diesel shows up as correct but most articles in science use BioDiesel and so let's say you allow this either way. You just broke your stupid rule. Now do you see why I am opposed to making such a rule? Consider all this in 2006.