Consensus managers, on the other hand, start with the proposition that agreement among stakeholders must be obtained before action proceeds, a position that is intellectually defensible only if one believes all of the bulleted assumptions listed above to be true. Now consider the consequences of those assumptions.

• Decision-making becomes a political process instead of a merit-based pro
  Developing Your Soft Skills
  You may wonder why you need to develop soft skills when you have verifiable educational credentials and technical skills that make you an expert in your field. You only have to revisit the current job market scenario to understand the ‘why’ of this issue. As you dig deeper, you will understand why soft skills are so important!Top Reasons Why You Must Develop Soft SkillsBefore answering this question let us examine which skills can help you promote your job and career goals. The
  The old-fashioned autocratic manager who ruled with an iron hand and controlled everything from the top has pretty much vanished from the management scene. Not many regret his passing. There is no doubt that today's enterprises operate far more humanely than did their old school predecessors, at least on the surface.

  Although "Theory X" management has been replaced in virtually all sectors, successor approaches have their own weaknesses. This brief article is intended to raise two ideas for your thoughtful consideration. The first is that distinctions exist between participatory management and consensus management. The second is that important consequences flow from those distinctions.

  Participatory management and consensus management practitioners both understand that employees have perspectives that are potentially valuable to the decision-making process and that "buy in" plays a vital motivational role with real consequences for performance. Beyond this initial point of agreement, distinctions emerge. To put the matter in perspective, consider the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following assumption statements.

  • Obtaining agreement among stakeholders should be the controlling consideration when reaching a decision that affects the organization, regardless of the issue.
  • All ideas have equal merit.
  • Everyone's contribution should be given equal weight in the decision process, regardless of expertise or responsibilities.
  • The best interest of the organization is always equal to the sum of the best interests of its departments and stakeholders.
  
  

  Participatory managers recognize a foundational management principle; i.e., authority can be delegated but responsibility cannot. Participatory managers seek input from all whose views can benefit the process. However, final decision-making is reserved to those who ultimately bear the responsibility for the decision.

  Consensus managers, on the other hand, start with the proposition that agreement among stakeholders must be obtained before action proceeds, a position that is intellectually defensible only if one believes all of the bulleted assumptions listed above to be true. Now consider the consequences of those assumptions.

  • Decision-making becomes a political process instead of a merit-based proc
    Franchise Expansion Thru Regional Team Manager Agreements
    One potential marketing strategy for franchisors is to set up two-year agreements with star franchisees to assist in the expansion of regional areas without selling those areas a master franchises. In doing so the franchisor can have more control over the marketing of new franchises and say over which territories and agreements will be entered into, without giving up any control.The fee structure could be a percentage of franchise fees in each sale and a percentage of royalties. The d
    raise two ideas for your thoughtful consideration. The first is that distinctions exist between participatory management and consensus management. The second is that important consequences flow from those distinctions.

    Participatory management and consensus management practitioners both understand that employees have perspectives that are potentially valuable to the decision-making process and that "buy in" plays a vital motivational role with real consequences for performance. Beyond this initial point of agreement, distinctions emerge. To put the matter in perspective, consider the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following assumption statements.

    • Obtaining agreement among stakeholders should be the controlling consideration when reaching a decision that affects the organization, regardless of the issue.
    • All ideas have equal merit.
    • Everyone's contribution should be given equal weight in the decision process, regardless of expertise or responsibilities.
    • The best interest of the organization is always equal to the sum of the best interests of its departments and stakeholders.
    
    

    Participatory managers recognize a foundational management principle; i.e., authority can be delegated but responsibility cannot. Participatory managers seek input from all whose views can benefit the process. However, final decision-making is reserved to those who ultimately bear the responsibility for the decision.

    Consensus managers, on the other hand, start with the proposition that agreement among stakeholders must be obtained before action proceeds, a position that is intellectually defensible only if one believes all of the bulleted assumptions listed above to be true. Now consider the consequences of those assumptions.

    • Decision-making becomes a political process instead of a merit-based pro
      16 Ways to Make Your Business Cards Unforgettable
      Every time you hear someone say “May I have one of your business cards?" you should get excited. I know I do. That’s because I LOVE my cards. I spent thousands of dollars on printing, several hours on designing and went through 10 different layouts until I got them right.And it was all worth it.A business card is an entrepreneur’s best friend, his most valuable marketing tool and an essential element to becoming UNFORGETTABLE. Unfortunately, too many people have business ca
      mance. Beyond this initial point of agreement, distinctions emerge. To put the matter in perspective, consider the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following assumption statements.
      • Obtaining agreement among stakeholders should be the controlling consideration when reaching a decision that affects the organization, regardless of the issue.
      • All ideas have equal merit.
      • Everyone's contribution should be given equal weight in the decision process, regardless of expertise or responsibilities.
      • The best interest of the organization is always equal to the sum of the best interests of its departments and stakeholders.
      
      

      Participatory managers recognize a foundational management principle; i.e., authority can be delegated but responsibility cannot. Participatory managers seek input from all whose views can benefit the process. However, final decision-making is reserved to those who ultimately bear the responsibility for the decision.

      Consensus managers, on the other hand, start with the proposition that agreement among stakeholders must be obtained before action proceeds, a position that is intellectually defensible only if one believes all of the bulleted assumptions listed above to be true. Now consider the consequences of those assumptions.

      • Decision-making becomes a political process instead of a merit-based pro
        Career Vision: Moving Your Life From Stress To Balance
        The Stress Cycle is that never- ending cycle of short-term focus, external motivation and reactive decision-making that results in stress, anxiety, burnout and depression.The Balance Cycle requires long-term thinking, clarity of internal motivation and pro-active decision making.The vehicle for moving from the Stress Cycle to the Balance Cycle is a personal vision for your life and your career. This is a picture of yourself in the future that is meaningful and fulfilling for yo
        eight in the decision process, regardless of expertise or responsibilities.
      • The best interest of the organization is always equal to the sum of the best interests of its departments and stakeholders.
      
      

      Participatory managers recognize a foundational management principle; i.e., authority can be delegated but responsibility cannot. Participatory managers seek input from all whose views can benefit the process. However, final decision-making is reserved to those who ultimately bear the responsibility for the decision.

      Consensus managers, on the other hand, start with the proposition that agreement among stakeholders must be obtained before action proceeds, a position that is intellectually defensible only if one believes all of the bulleted assumptions listed above to be true. Now consider the consequences of those assumptions.

      • Decision-making becomes a political process instead of a merit-based pro
        Flowers Have Magic of Countenance
        Perhaps the most popular way to present a gift is to present flowers because flowers appeal to all our senses and brighten up our lives and our hearts. Perhaps you can find difficult to express your exact feelings and sentiments in words but you can express your exact sentiments by presenting flowers. Flowers bring good cheer and convey the right message in their own language – truest language of love. That’s why the popularity of flowers is.But there is a question which arise in our
        eserved to those who ultimately bear the responsibility for the decision.

        Consensus managers, on the other hand, start with the proposition that agreement among stakeholders must be obtained before action proceeds, a position that is intellectually defensible only if one believes all of the bulleted assumptions listed above to be true. Now consider the consequences of those assumptions.

        • Decision-making becomes a political process instead of a merit-based process with the pace and outcome controlled by the least flexible and most obdurate participants.
        • Consensus management is inherently biased toward inaction. All that is necessary to block any action is to prevent consensus. Self-evidently, this characteristic is not conducive to success in a competitive environment defined by fast-paced change.
        • Decision quality is degraded, at least from a business perspective. That is because the goal becomes identifying a solution that is the least offensive to all stakeholders rather than choosing the course of action that is most beneficial to the enterprise.
        • An inevitable consequence of using consensus as a surrogate for the executive function in an organization designed to operate as a hierarchy is a diminution of the very concept of accountability. When everyone is responsible, no one is accountable.
        
        

        This is not to say that consensus management is never a good idea. In an organization of true peers, all of whom share a common skill set, the same organizational perspective, and an identical stake in the decision outcome, it may well work. That description, however, does not apply to the typical management team.

        It has been our observation that consensus decision-making is strongly associated with the presence of information silos and organizational gridlock. All executives and managers would be well advised to consider how the current choice of decision-making models is affecting the quality and timeliness of management action.