Tags |
|
|
Casual Articles - Database Hacks - Are Banks Required To Notify You?
Paid money-making programs are not always the right choice for online marketing newbies. All the secrets to making money online revolve a simple, yet important, concept - the perfect match between the product you're promoting and the needs of the market you're operating in. My experience tells me that you can get star
The best method for keeping an eye on database breaches is to look for stories in the news. Under California law, companies are required to gi
Getting large amounts of people to your web site can be as easy as writing a few articles. I have found that writing articles can bring in huge amounts of traffic when done correctly. You can literally find your articles in front of millions of web sites on the search engines results, for popular search terms. All thi
Regulations have been issued by federal finance agencies that now force banks to tell customers when their personal data has been exposed to unauthorized third parties. The regulations are issued pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which contains language requiring financial institutions to prevent unauthorized access and use of consumer information.
The new regulations appear to be a reaction to several recent high-profile data leaks. They include incidents such as Bank of America losing data tapes containing information for over 1 million government employees and the breach of databases for LexisNexis and ChoicePoint. It is well known that numerous other banks have also been hacked over the years, but the information has been hushed up.
The new regulations require financial institutions to notify account holders if the institution becomes aware of unauthorized access to sensitive customer information. The directives apply to banks and savings and loan companies, but not credit unions.
There are two serious loopholes in the regulations. First, a financial institution that discovers a database breach must only notify account holders if it is "reasonably possible" that personal details will be misused. Second, the regulations only apply to personal data, not business or commercial accounts.
While these new regulations are a positive step, one could drive a truck through the two loopholes. Determining whether it is “reasonably possible” that your information will be misused is a vague standard that many financial institutions will use to withhold information. Put bluntly, the notification regulations are gutless.
The best method for keeping an eye on database breaches is to look for stories in the news. Under California law, companies are required to giv
Affixing dates on documents is a crucial procedure in inward and outward departments of government agencies and other offices because, at times, there are legal implications associated with such dates. Writing dates manually on a large bunch of documents is labor intensive. Such a task is also monotonous, and therefor
The new regulations appear to be a reaction to several recent high-profile data leaks. They include incidents such as Bank of America losing data tapes containing information for over 1 million government employees and the breach of databases for LexisNexis and ChoicePoint. It is well known that numerous other banks have also been hacked over the years, but the information has been hushed up.
The new regulations require financial institutions to notify account holders if the institution becomes aware of unauthorized access to sensitive customer information. The directives apply to banks and savings and loan companies, but not credit unions.
There are two serious loopholes in the regulations. First, a financial institution that discovers a database breach must only notify account holders if it is "reasonably possible" that personal details will be misused. Second, the regulations only apply to personal data, not business or commercial accounts.
While these new regulations are a positive step, one could drive a truck through the two loopholes. Determining whether it is “reasonably possible” that your information will be misused is a vague standard that many financial institutions will use to withhold information. Put bluntly, the notification regulations are gutless.
The best method for keeping an eye on database breaches is to look for stories in the news. Under California law, companies are required to gi
Is there a name for the opposite of "the Midas Touch?" I'm not talking about brakes and mufflers, here. I'm talking about the king who had the disturbing experience of having everything he touched turn to gold.In the end, it wasn't all that great-I've just gone through a week-long period where everyth
The new regulations require financial institutions to notify account holders if the institution becomes aware of unauthorized access to sensitive customer information. The directives apply to banks and savings and loan companies, but not credit unions.
There are two serious loopholes in the regulations. First, a financial institution that discovers a database breach must only notify account holders if it is "reasonably possible" that personal details will be misused. Second, the regulations only apply to personal data, not business or commercial accounts.
While these new regulations are a positive step, one could drive a truck through the two loopholes. Determining whether it is “reasonably possible” that your information will be misused is a vague standard that many financial institutions will use to withhold information. Put bluntly, the notification regulations are gutless.
The best method for keeping an eye on database breaches is to look for stories in the news. Under California law, companies are required to gi
Why is planning so important? Just take a look at those dot.com failures in year 2000. Many of them failed because of poor planning! Some of the factors contributing to their failures included not knowing the market, the competition, and the environment of the business. These could be avoided with proper planning.
There are two serious loopholes in the regulations. First, a financial institution that discovers a database breach must only notify account holders if it is "reasonably possible" that personal details will be misused. Second, the regulations only apply to personal data, not business or commercial accounts.
While these new regulations are a positive step, one could drive a truck through the two loopholes. Determining whether it is “reasonably possible” that your information will be misused is a vague standard that many financial institutions will use to withhold information. Put bluntly, the notification regulations are gutless.
The best method for keeping an eye on database breaches is to look for stories in the news. Under California law, companies are required to gi
If you have not yet established a credit record for yourself or you are in the process of rebuilding your credit, getting a credit card can greatly help you. The fact is, credit cards are one of the best ways to build a credit history and increase your credit worthiness.If you wondering why you need to buil
The best method for keeping an eye on database breaches is to look for stories in the news. Under California law, companies are required to give notice to California residents when breaches occur. If you see a story about your bank giving notice of a hack to California residents, your personal information may have also been exposed. Hackers do not restrict their attacks to California residents.
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.casualarticles.com/article/129287/casualarticles-Database-Hacks--Are-Banks-Required-To-Notify-You.html">Database Hacks - Are Banks Required To Notify You?</a>
BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.casualarticles.com/article/129287/casualarticles-Database-Hacks--Are-Banks-Required-To-Notify-You.html]Database Hacks - Are Banks Required To Notify You?[/url]
Related Articles:
Trainee Accountant Jobs - Insurance Accountancy Qualific
The Marketing Formula That Produces Profits
7 Options To Consider When Taking Out A New Credit Card
Bookmark it:
|