Investors Chasing Uranium Mining Stocks, Again: A Favorite Emerges
Fifty years ago, uranium fever hit Wall Street. It was then just a few years after a Navajo shepherd in New Mexico, by the name of Paddy Martinez, discovered “yellow rocks” on his property, mistaking them at first for gold. An avalanche of 1950s dollars (more valuable than the ones we have today) poured into mutual funds and uranium mining stocks, sending

Add Value First, Reap Value Later
I was teaching about customer intimacy and loyalty when one participant asked, ‘What if your competitor has already built a close relationship with a customer, and you want to get inside?’I replied, ‘Add value first. You will reap value later.’How can you help prospective customers right now – even before they become your paying customers?The highest result of the labor turnover rate, 7.05 per cent was experienced by the company in 2001; in 2002 turnover rate was the second largest – reaching almost 3.85 per cent; whereas in 1999, the turnover rate reached almost 3.57 per cent. In contrast, labor turnover rate was the smallest in 2000 and 2003, whereas years 2004 and 2005 exhibit similar results of about 1.46 and 1.4 per cent, respectively.

When it comes to accession rate, it was the highest during 1999, which can be attributed to overall company growth. While the pick of employee turnover was in 2001, an increase in accession rate followed to make up for the employees that left company. Accession rate reached 18.13 percent in 2002. The lowest accession rate was in 2003 – only 2.15 per cent. During 2000, 2001, and 2004, results exhibit rela

3.85 per cent; whereas in 1999, the turnover rate reached almost 3.57 per cent. In contrast, labor turnover rate was the smallest in 2000 and 2003, whereas years 2004 and 2005 exhibit similar results of about 1.46 and 1.4 per cent, respectively.

When it comes to accession rate, it was the highest during 1999, which can be attributed to overall company growth. While the pick of employee turnover was in 2001, an increase in accession rate followed to make up for the employees that left company. Accession rate reached 18.13 percent in 2002. The lowest accession rate was in 2003 – only 2.15 per cent. During 2000, 2001, and 2004, results exhibit rel

4 and 2005 exhibit similar results of about 1.46 and 1.4 per cent, respectively.

When it comes to accession rate, it was the highest during 1999, which can be attributed to overall company growth. While the pick of employee turnover was in 2001, an increase in accession rate followed to make up for the employees that left company. Accession rate reached 18.13 percent in 2002. The lowest accession rate was in 2003 – only 2.15 per cent. During 2000, 2001, and 2004, results exhibit rel

attributed to overall company growth. While the pick of employee turnover was in 2001, an increase in accession rate followed to make up for the employees that left company. Accession rate reached 18.13 percent in 2002. The lowest accession rate was in 2003 – only 2.15 per cent. During 2000, 2001, and 2004, results exhibit rel company. Accession rate reached 18.13 percent in 2002. The lowest accession rate was in 2003 – only 2.15 per cent. During 2000, 2001, and 2004, results exhibit relatively similar accession rates patterns – 9.15, 8.97, and 11.17 per cent, respectively.

The average correlation between employee job level and longevity of employment is -0.54, as expected. As the data employed had 1 as the highest job level, an increase is the job level of an employee results in a higher possibility of a drop out. As such, employee empowerment and labor turnover are negatively related. At the same time, data exhibits significant differences across the five sub periods. Within years 2000 and up until 2004, the relationship between job level and labor turnover is the opposite of the general trends and correlation between 2003- 2